State-of-the-art luminescent materials based on wood veneer with superior strength, transparency, and water resistance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Current energy and luminescent materials utilize polymers to encapsulate fluorescent carbon nanodots and dyes but they usually lack stability and biodegradability. Here, we introduce an alternative wood nanotechnology to produce luminescent films (veneer) with UV resistance and tailorable surface energy. First, fluorescent and transparent wood (FTW) is shown as a support of aggregation-induced fluorescent emission (AIE) by in-situ Hantzsch reaction of acetoacetate delignified wood (AA-DW). Highly aligned cellulose nanofibers present in AA-DW facilitate FTW densification, ensuing exceptional mechanical performance (tensile strength and Young's modulus of up to 422 MPa and 45 GPa, respectively). Simultaneously, the conjugated structures display high transparency (83 %), haze (80 %) and optical anisotropy. The new luminescent system is demonstrated to be biodegradable and effective in optical (fluorescent) windows as well as encrypted films.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".