Resolving some of the earliest names for <i>Corallina</i> species (Corallinales, Rhodophyta) in the North Pacific by sequencing type specimens and describing the cryptic <i>C. hakodatensis</i> sp. nov. and <i>C. parva</i> sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Partial rbcL sequences from type specimens of three of the earliest described Corallina species showed that C. arbuscula (type locality: Unalaska Island, Alaska, USA) and C. pilulifera (type locality: Okhotsk Sea, Russia) are synonymous, with C. pilulifera as the taxonomically accepted name and that C. vancouveriensis (type locality: Botanical Beach, Vancouver Island, Canada) is a distinct species. To identify molecular species limits and clarify descriptions and distributions of C. pilulifera and C. vancouveriensis, we sequenced and analyzed portions of one mitochondrial and two plastid genes from historical and recent collections. The single-gene phylogenetic reconstructions support the recognition of both species as distinct, as well as two additional species, C. hakodatensis sp. nov. and C. parva sp. nov., which are sister to, and often morphologically indistinguishable from C. pilulifera and C. vancouveriensis, respectively. DNA sequence data currently illustrate that C. pilulifera is found in the cold northern Pacific waters from the Okhotsk Sea of Russia to Hokkaido, Japan, eastward across the Aleutian Islands to Knoll Head, Alaska, and as far south as Nanaimo, British Columbia. Corallina vancouveriensis is distributed as far west as Attu Island in the Aleutian Islands to Sitka, Alaska, and southeasterly at numerous sites from British Columbia to the north of Point Conception, California, USA. The cryptic species C. hakodatensis and C. parva occur sympatrically with their sister species but with narrower ranges. The complex phylogenetic relationships shown by the single gene trees recommend Corallina as a model genus to explore coralline algal biogeography, evolution, and patterns of speciation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".