MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308387594 · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.105519

Implications of differential transcription start site selection on chronic myeloid leukemia and prostate cancer cell protein expression

2022· article· en· W4308387594 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Arif Anwer Surani, Keith A. Spriggs, Christoph Ufer, Christos Polytarchou, Cristina Montiel‐Duarte

Bibliographic record

VenueiScience · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTrent UniversityNottingham Trent University
KeywordsMyeloid leukemiaPromoterTranscription (linguistics)BiologyTranscription factorUntranslated regionProstate cancerCancer researchComputational biologyCell biologyBioinformaticsMessenger RNAGeneticsCancerGene expressionGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The relevance of minor transcription start sites in broad promoters is not well understood. We have studied AGAP2 expression in prostate cancer and chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), showing transcription is initiated from alternative transcription start sites (TSSs) within a single TSS cluster, producing cancer-type-specific AGAP2 mRNAs with small differences in their 5' UTR length. Interestingly, in the CML cell lines where the 5' UTR is longer, AGAP2 protein levels are lower. We demonstrate that the selection of an upstream TSS involved the formation of a G quadruplex in the 5' UTR, decreasing polysome formation. After developing a bioinformatics pipeline to query data from the FANTOM project and the NCl-60 human tumour cell lines screen, we found HK1 expression can also be regulated by the same mechanism. Overall, we present compelling data supporting TSS selection within a TSS cluster play a role on protein expression and should not be ignored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueiScienceSame topicDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryFrench-language works237,207