MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308452385 · doi:10.1139/cjes-2022-0053

Analysis of chemical weathering trends across three compositional dimensions: applications to modern and ancient mafic-rock weathering profiles

2022· article· en· W4308452385 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Michael G. Babechuk, Christopher M. Fedo

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaficWeatheringGeologyMineralogyPrecambrianDiagenesisGeochemistryTrace element

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chemical weathering indices (one-dimensional/1D index values) and accompanying ternary plots (two-dimensional/2D compositional space) facilitate quantitative comparison of whole-rock and mineral major-element data, and empirical chemical trends with predicted weathering vectors. However, data analysis in ternary plots is restricted by poles grouping elements that are hosted in different minerals or that are influenced selectively by later alteration (e.g., diagenesis/metasomatism). Tetrahedral plots (three-dimensional/3D compositional space) offer enhanced analytical utility of major-element data by shifting elements across four poles and (or) incorporating additional proxy elements. Tetrahedral space can better reveal combined effects on major-element compositions from independent mineralogical controls and post-depositional alteration via curvilinear trends that are otherwise simplified and linear in ternary space. This study focuses on mafic-rock weathering and first reviews applications and limitations of the 1D mafic index of alteration (MIA) and index of lateritization/bauxitization (IOL/IOB) that integrate into molar Al 2 O 3 –CaO * –Na 2 O–K 2 O–(FeO (T) /Fe 2 O 3(T) )–MgO and SiO 2 –Al 2 O 3 –Fe 2 O 3(T) ternary compositional space, respectively. Analysis in tetrahedral space is then demonstrated with Phanerozoic weathering profile and Precambrian paleosol data in two plots of the molar Al 2 O 3 –CaO * –Na 2 O–K 2 O–(FeO (T) /Fe 2 O 3(T) )–MgO system (A–CN–K–FM and AF–CN–K–M plots) and one plot of the molar Al 2 O 3 –CaO * –Na 2 O–K 2 O–(FeO (T) /Fe 2 O 3(T) )–MgO–SiO 2 system (A–L–F–S plot). Common chemical weathering indices are integrated into these 3D tetrahedral spaces or onto some of their 2D ternary faces. However, the tetrahedral compositional space is a key to (1) assessing integrative effects from labile element loss while accounting for the variable, redox-dependent behaviour of Fe, (2) better exposing, and correcting for, overprinting effects of diagenesis/metasomatism, and (3) tracking Si loss across all stages of chemical weathering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisFrench-language works237,207