Chemical weathering over hundreds of millions of years of greenhouse conditions on Mars
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Chemical weathering profiles on Mars which consist of an upper Al clay-rich, Fe-poor layer and lower Fe/Mg clay-rich layer are believed to have formed due to precipitation-driven top down leaching process in an ancient, reducing greenhouse climate. Here we use remote sensing imagery and spectroscopy coupled with topographic data and crater chronology to explore the geological characteristics, stratigraphy and relative age of >200 weathering profiles across the southern highlands of Mars. We find that nearly all exposures show a similar, single stratigraphic relationship of Al/Si materials over Fe/Mg clays rather than multiple, interbedded mineralogical transitions. This suggests either one single climate warming event or, perhaps more likely, chemical resetting of weathering horizons during multiple events. While the time required to form a typical martian weathering profile may have been only ∼106−107years, the profiles occur in deposits dating from the Early Noachian into the Hesperian and suggest that chemical weathering may have occurred over a large range of geologic time, with a peak around 3.7–3.8 billion years ago.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".