MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308480784 · doi:10.1109/jstqe.2022.3211310

The Silicon-Based XOI Wafer: The Most General Electronics-Photonics Platform for Computing, Sensing, and Communications

2022· article· en· W4308480784 on OpenAlexafffund
Richard Soref, Bhavin J. Shastri, Alexander N. Tait

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWaferPhotonicsOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceSilicon on insulatorSilicon photonicsPhotonic integrated circuitElectronicsSiliconElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes that the 300-mm-diameter silicon wafer coated with a thin insulator layer, which becomes a buried layer, is the most general and most capable platform for high-volume foundry-manufactured, waveguided, photonic integrated circuits (PICs) and for the on-wafer electronics that control and signal-process the photonics. We call this “on insulator” platform an electronic- photonic (or optoelectronic) integrated-circuit wafer. For a few potential applications like “general intelligence” (Shainline et al., 2021), entire wafers would be deployed. However, in almost every case, the wafer will be diced into hundreds of electronic-photonic chips (chips are the real aim of wafer creation). Those chips would be commercial products or custom-made, application-specific PICs. The goal of this paper is to present a detailed vision of the ultimate electronic- photonic wafers that: (1) serve a vast range of applications, (2) operate at any wavelength within the ultraviolet, visible, near-infrared and middle infrared, (3) provide low-loss, well-confined optical waveguiding across the wafer, (4) utilize an optimized or application-specific combination of photonic materials including semiconductors, insulators, ferroelectrics, poled polymers (Xu et al., 2022), phase-change materials (PCMs) (Wuttig et al., 2017), plasmonics (Moor et al., 2021), (Amin et al., 2021), and 2D materials such as graphene (Liu et al., 2020), (5) offer one-or-more practical electro-optical modulation-and-switching mechanisms that are discussed below, (6) offer on-wafer laser diodes, wavelength-multiplexed comb sources, LEDs, optical amplifiers, and photodetectors, (7) provide a full range of CMOS-or-“other” control electronics as well as electronic memories and data converters (analog-to-digital and digital-to-analog), and (8) are manufacturable in volume by proven techniques such as wafer bonding, smart cut, and hetero-epitaxy– or are made by emerging methods. The insulator mentioned above could be silicon dioxide (SiO2) or alumina (Al2O3), or silicon nitride (Si3N4or SiN). SiO2is generally preferred, but the Al2O3and the SiN offer better mid- infrared transparency than the oxide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum ElectronicsSame topicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207