Association of Equatorward Extending Auroral Streamers With Ground Magnetic Perturbations and Geosynchronous Injections
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Auroral streamers have been found to be a particularly important cause of magnetic perturbations within the auroral oval during substorms. We present a detailed investigation on the association of equatorward extending auroral streamers with ground magnetic perturbations at locations initially equatorward of the auroral oval using Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions imagers and ground magnetometers. Based on the analysis of four events, we show that negative perturbations in the horizontal (H) component at initially subauroral latitudes were not seen prior to streamer onset, and the peak negative H‐bay at subauroral latitudes coincided with the equatorward extending auroral streamers. Although stations close to the poleward boundary of auroral oval showed modest H‐component perturbations in response to the substorm onset and poleward auroral intensifications, the abrupt and large responses within the oval were associated with the onset of streamers. Results confirm that ground magnetic perturbations that are traditionally perceived as signatures of magnetic substorm onset are not always an auroral substorm onset but can also be related to auroral streamers. These results are supported by the remarkable correlation of positive bay onset and sudden Pi2 enhancement with the onset of auroral streamers, irrespective of the classical substorm onset. In addition, the magnitude of positive bay and amplitude of Pi2 pulsations, particularly at subauroral latitudes, are enhanced during the events of equatorward extending streamers. In general, all streamer events were accompanied by dipolarization and electron flux enhancement at geosynchronous orbit that continue to strengthen during the emergence of bright streamers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".