MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308491022 · doi:10.1016/j.gocm.2022.10.004

Advanced maternal age and adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies

2022· article· en· W4308491022 on OpenAlexaff
Mitra Shekari, Malihe Shirzadfardjahromi, Amene Ranjbar, Vahid Mehrnoush, Fatemeh Darsareh, Nasibeh Roozbeh

Bibliographic record

VenueGynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Medicine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsNOSM University
FundersHormozgan University of Medical Sciences
KeywordsSingletonObstetricsMedicineAdvanced maternal agePregnancyFetus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective To assess the impact of advanced maternal age on pregnancy and childbirth outcomes of singleton pregnancies. Study design We retrospectively assessed singleton pregnant mothers who gave birth at Khaleej-e-Fars Hospital in Bandar Abbas, Iran, from January 2020 to January 2022. Demographic and obstetrical factors include educational level, medical insurance, residency place, access to prenatal care facilities, number of prenatal care visits, smoking status, gestational age, parity, infertility, maternal comorbidities, preeclampsia, eclampsia, preterm birth, low birth weight (LBW), intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), macrosomia, placenta abnormalities (previa/acreta), placenta abruption, chorioamnionitis, meconium fluid, fetal distress, methods of delivery, rate of cesarean section (CS), perineal lacerations, postpartum hemorrhage, childbirth injury, shoulder dystocia, congenital malformation, neonatal asphyxia, and unfavorable maternal and neonatal outcome were compared between two groups. The Chi-square test assessed the relationship between categorical factors and maternal age groups. The influence of advanced maternal age on the risk of unfavorable pregnancy outcomes was evaluated using bivariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results Of 8354 singleton deliveries, 22.2% belonged to advanced-age mothers. Advanced-age mothers had less education than those aged 20–34 years old. Chronic hypertension, cardiovascular disease, overt diabetes, and thyroid dysfunction were more prevalent among advanced-age mothers. Compared with mothers aged 20–34 years, mothers aged 35 years and higher had a significantly higher risk of gestational diabetes (aOR: 3.18, 95%CI: 1.56–6.95), preeclampsia (aOR: 2.91, 95%CI: 1.35–4.72), placenta abnormalities (aOR: 1.09, 95%CI: 0.77–1.94), CS (aOR: 3.16, 95%CI: 1.51–3.87), postpartum hemorrhage (aOR: 1.94, 95%CI: 1.24–2.61), intensive care unit admission (aOR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.15–1.99), LBW (aOR: 1.35, 95%CI: 0.97–2.96), preterm birth (aOR: 2.36, 95%CI: 1.65–4.83), stillbirth (aOR: 1.18, 95%CI: 1.01–3.16), and neonatal intensive care admission (aOR: 2.09, 95%CI: 0.73–3.92). According to bivariate regression, the risk of meconium fluid was lower in advanced-age mothers; however, the result of multivariate logistic regression found no correlation between advanced age and the Incidence of meconium fluid. Conclusion Advanced-age mothers are at increased risk of adverse pregnancy and childbirth outcomes, which persist even after adjusting for several potential confounders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGynecology and Obstetrics Clinical MedicineSame topicAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyFrench-language works237,207