The Small-N Series in the Zero-Dimensional O(N) Model: Constructive Expansions and Transseries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We consider the zero-dimensional quartic O ( N ) vector model and present a complete study of the partition function Z ( g , N ) and its logarithm, the free energy W ( g , N ), seen as functions of the coupling g on a Riemann surface. We are, in particular, interested in the study of the transseries expansions of these quantities. The point of this paper is to recover such results using constructive field theory techniques with the aim to use them in the future for a rigorous analysis of resurgence in genuine quantum field theoretical models in higher dimensions. Using constructive field theory techniques, we prove that both Z ( g , N ) and W ( g , N ) are Borel summable functions along all the rays in the cut complex plane $$\mathbb {C}_{\pi } =\mathbb {C}{\setminus } \mathbb {R}_-$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mi>π</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mo>\</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . We recover the transseries expansion of Z ( g , N ) using the intermediate field representation. We furthermore study the small- N expansions of Z ( g , N ) and W ( g , N ). For any $$g=|g| e^{\imath \varphi }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>g</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>|</mml:mo> <mml:mi>g</mml:mi> <mml:mo>|</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>e</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ı</mml:mi> <mml:mi>φ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> on the sector of the Riemann surface with $$|\varphi |<3\pi /2$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>|</mml:mo> <mml:mi>φ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>|</mml:mo> <mml:mo><</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:mi>π</mml:mi> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , the small- N expansion of Z ( g , N ) has infinite radius of convergence in N , while the expansion of W ( g , N ) has a finite radius of convergence in N for g in a subdomain of the same sector. The Taylor coefficients of these expansions, $$Z_n(g)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>Z</mml:mi> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>g</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and $$W_n(g)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>W</mml:mi> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>g</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , exhibit analytic properties similar to Z ( g , N ) and W ( g , N ) and have transseries expansions. The transseries expansion of $$Z_n(g)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>Z</mml:mi> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>g</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> is readily accessible: much like Z ( g , N ), for any n , $$Z_n(g)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>Z</mml:mi> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>g</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> has a zero- and a one-instanton contribution. The transseries of $$W_n(g)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>W</mml:mi> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>g</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> is obtained using Möbius inversion, and summing these transseries yields the transseries expansion of W ( g , N ). The transseries of $$W_n(g)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>W</mml:mi> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>g</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and W ( g , N ) are markedly different: while W ( g , N ) displays contributions from arbitrarily many multi-instantons, $$W_n(g)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>W</mml:mi> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>g</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> exhibits contributions of only up to n -instanton sectors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".