Rapid iPSC inclusionopathy models shed light on formation, consequence and molecular subtype of α-synuclein inclusions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Intracellular inclusions accompanying neurodegeneration are histopathologically and ultrastructurally heterogeneous but the significance of this heterogeneity is unclear. iPSC models, while promising for disease modeling, do not form inclusions in a reasonable timeframe and suffer from limited tractability. Here, we developed an iPSC toolbox utilizing piggyBac-based or targeted transgenes to rapidly induce CNS cells with concomitant expression of aggregation-prone proteins. This system is amenable to screening and longitudinal tracking at single-cell and single-inclusion resolution. For proof-of-principle, cortical neuron α-synuclein “inclusionopathy” models were engineered to form inclusions through exogenous seeding or α-synuclein mutation. These models recapitulated known fibril- and lipid-rich inclusion subtypes, uncovering dynamic interactions between them, and refined the classification of inclusions in postmortem brain. Genetic-modifier and protein-interaction screens pinpointed proteins like RhoA whose sequestration into specific inclusion subtypes is likely to be toxic. This iPSC platform should enhance our understanding of proteinaceous pathologies in neurodegeneration and facilitate therapeutics development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".