Ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block versus transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia in children with hip dislocation: A double-blind, randomized trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Lumbar plexus block is often used as analgesia for adult hip surgery, but it is rarely used in pediatric patients. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and feasibility of ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block versus transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in children with hip dislocation. Eighty children undergoing unilateral hip dislocation surgeries at our hospital from October 2019 to February 2021 were randomized to the lumbar plexus block group (group L) and transversus abdominis plane block group (group T). Compared with group L, the regional block time in group T was lower (8.0 ± 2.5 vs 11.5 ± 2.3 min,P< 0.05), and the ultrasound image definition was better (P< 0.05). There were no significant differences in mean blood pressure and heart rate within 24 h (allP> 0.05). Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale scores were lower in group L than in group T at 18–24 h only (allP< 0.05). The satisfying analgesia rate in group L was higher than in group T (87.5 vs 65%,P< 0.05). No regional block-related complications were found in both groups. Ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block showed a longer postoperative analgesic effect in children with hip dislocation compared with transversus abdominis plane block.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".