MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4308842278 · doi:10.31234/osf.io/32ect

Development, Reach, Acceptability and Associated Clinical Changes of a Group Intervention to Improve Caregiver-Adolescent Relationships in the Context of Adolescent Depression

2022· preprint· en· W4308842278 on OpenAlexafffund
Madison Aitken, Ameeta Sagar, Darren Courtney, Peter Szatmari

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersCundill Centre for Child and Youth DepressionCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
KeywordsPsychoeducationPsychological interventionAttendanceIntervention (counseling)Context (archaeology)Clinical psychologyPsychologyDepression (economics)Randomized controlled trialFamily caregiversPsychiatryMedicineGerontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. Adolescents with depression often experience relationship problems with their caregivers, which predict poorer treatment outcomes. Personalizing interventions by targeting factors associated with poor treatment outcomes may enhance the effectiveness of interventions. We report the development and initial evaluation of an intervention designed to target caregiver-adolescent relationship problems in the context of adolescent depression.Methods. Following a literature search to identify established caregiver interventions, we developed a new group intervention for caregivers through an iterative process including 6 rounds of the group with n = 55 caregivers of adolescents age 13-18 in the context of an integrated care pathway for adolescent depression. Caregivers rated their family functioning at the beginning and end of the program and provided anonymous satisfaction ratings. Enrolment and attendance data were examined. Youth with lived experience of depression and their caregivers provided input that was incorporated in the final version of the intervention. Results. The final intervention consists of 8 weekly, 1.5 hour group sessions, delivered face-to-face, addressing: psychoeducation, the cognitive-behavioural model and caregiving, positive caregiving, listening and validation, expressing emotions effectively, and problem solving. Reach (59%), attendance (63%), and satisfaction (M = 92%) supported the feasibility of the program. Caregivers reported significant improvements in family functioning.Discussion. A group intervention is acceptable to caregivers of adolescents with depression and may be associated with improved family functioning. Further research is needed, including a randomized controlled trial to test effects of the intervention on various dimensions of the caregiver-youth relationship and on youth depression outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development→French-language works237,207→