MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308884635 · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcac292

Neuromuscular symptoms in patients with <i>RYR1</i>-related malignant hyperthermia and rhabdomyolysis

2022· article· en· W4308884635 on OpenAlexaff
Luuk R. van den Bersselaar, Heinz Jungbluth, Nick Kruijt, Erik‐Jan Kamsteeg, Miguel Ángel Fernández-García, Susan Treves, Sheila Riazi, Ignacio Malagon, Lucas T. van Eijk, Nens van Alfen, Baziel G.M. van Engelen, Gert‐Jan Scheffer, Marc Snoeck, Nicol C. Voermans

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Communications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalignant hyperthermiaRhabdomyolysisRYR1MedicinemyalgiaCreatine kinaseWeaknessMyopathyInternal medicinePhysical therapyAnesthesiaSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Malignant hyperthermia and exertional rhabdomyolysis have conventionally been considered episodic phenotypes that occur in otherwise healthy individuals in response to an external trigger. However, recent studies have demonstrated a clinical and histopathological continuum between patients with a history of malignant hyperthermia susceptibility and/or exertional rhabdomyolysis and RYR1-related congenital myopathies. We hypothesize that patients with a history of RYR1-related exertional rhabdomyolysis or malignant hyperthermia susceptibility do have permanent neuromuscular symptoms between malignant hyperthermia or exertional rhabdomyolysis episodes. We performed a prospective cross-sectional observational clinical study of neuromuscular features in patients with a history of RYR1-related exertional rhabdomyolysis and/or malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (n = 40) compared with healthy controls (n = 80). Patients with an RYR1-related congenital myopathy, manifesting as muscle weakness preceding other symptoms as well as other (neuromuscular) diseases resulting in muscle weakness were excluded. Study procedures included a standardized history of neuromuscular symptoms, a review of all relevant ancillary diagnostic tests performed up to the point of inclusion and a comprehensive, standardized neuromuscular assessment. Results of the standardized neuromuscular history were compared with healthy controls. Results of the neuromuscular assessment were compared with validated reference values. The proportion of patients suffering from cramps (P < 0.001), myalgia (P < 0.001) and exertional myalgia (P < 0.001) was higher compared with healthy controls. Healthcare professionals were consulted because of apparent neuromuscular symptoms by 17/40 (42.5%) patients and 7/80 (8.8%) healthy controls (P < 0.001). Apart from elevated creatine kinase levels in 19/40 (47.5%) patients and mild abnormalities on muscle biopsies identified in 13/16 (81.3%), ancillary investigations were normal in most patients. The Medical Research Council sum score, spirometry and results of functional measurements were also mostly normal. Three of 40 patients (7.5%) suffered from late-onset muscle weakness, most prominent in the proximal lower extremity muscles. Patients with RYR1 variants resulting in malignant hyperthermia susceptibility and/or exertional rhabdomyolysis frequently report additional neuromuscular symptoms such as myalgia and muscle cramps compared with healthy controls. These symptoms result in frequent consultation of healthcare professionals and sometimes in unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures. Most patients do have normal strength at a younger age but may develop muscle weakness later in life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain CommunicationsSame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207