MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308916936 · doi:10.1093/tas/txac144

Effects of a mixture of <i>Lentilactobacillus hilgardii, Lentilactobacillus buchneri, Pediococcus pentosaceus</i> and fibrolytic enzymes on silage fermentation, aerobic stability, and performance of growing beef cattle

2022· article· en· W4308916936 on OpenAlex
Jayakrishnan Nair, Hee‐Eun Yang, Abby-Ann P.H. Redman, Eric Chevaux, Pascal Drouin, Tim A. McAllister, Yuxi Wang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTranslational Animal Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsLallemand (Canada)Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSilageMicrobial inoculantLactobacillus buchneriFermentationLactic acidFood scienceForageSiloAnimal scienceBiologyChemistryAgronomyBacteriaLactobacillus plantarum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study evaluated the effects of novel silage inoculants containing lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and fibrolytic enzymes on ensiling, aerobic stability (AS), and the performance of growing beef cattle. Whole-plant corn forage was either uninoculated (CON) or inoculated with a mixture of LAB containing (cfu g−1 fresh forage) 1.5 × 105L. hilgardii (CNCM I-4785), 1.5 × 105L. buchneri (NCIMB 40788) and 1.0 × 105P. pentosaceus (NCIMB 12455) for a total of 4.0 × 105 cfu g−1 fresh forage LAB (IB), or a combination of IB plus fibrolytic enzymes (xylanase + β-glucanase) (IC). All treatments were ensiled in mini-silos, whereas CON and IC were also ensiled in silo bags for the growth performance study. Total bacteria (TB) counts were lower (P = 0.02) for IC than CON after 14 d of ensiling, whereas TB counts of IC and IB were greater (P ≤ 0.01) than CON after 60 d of ensiling in mini-silos. The LAB in IC and IB ensiled in mini-silos were greater than CON on d 60 (P ≤ 0.01) and 90 (P ≤ 0.001) of ensiling and after 3 d (P ≤ 0.01) of aerobic exposure (AE). Silage pH of IC ensiled in silo bags was lower than CON on d 3 (P &amp;lt; 0.01), 7 (P &amp;lt; 0.001), and 14 (P = 0.02) of AE. Yeast counts were lower for IC than CON in terminal silage (P &amp;lt; 0.001), and after 3 (P &amp;lt; 0.001) and 7 d (P &amp;lt; 0.01) of AE. Acetate (AC) concentrations were higher (P ≤ 0.02) for IC than CON throughout AE, whereas lactate (LA) concentrations of IC were greater than CON on d 3 (P &amp;lt; 0.001), 7 (P &amp;lt; 0.01), and 14 (P &amp;lt; 0.001) of AE. Greater AC concentration and lower yeast counts resulted in greater (P &amp;lt; 0.001) stability for IC ensiled in silo bags than CON after 14 d of AE. Growth performance of steers was similar (P &amp;gt; 0.05) as the nutrient composition of silage was similar across diets. Improved AS of IC could potentially have a greater impact on DMI, production efficiency, and growth performance in large-scale commercial feedlot operations where silage at the silo face may be exposed to air for longer periods of time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.637
Threshold uncertainty score0.269

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it