Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib for Management of Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: An Evidence-Based Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common skin condition characterized by inflammation that presents with erythematous and pruritic skin. Its chronic relapse-remitting nature has a significant impact on the quality of life, and often requires ongoing management. Given the limited treatments available for AD, there remains a large need for effective and safe alternative therapies for long-term use. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are a new class of agents that target the JAK-STAT pathway, which plays an important role in the production of proinflammatory cytokines involved in AD pathogenesis. Phase II and III clinical trials revealed that JAK inhibitors, such as upadacitinib, are effective and well-tolerated agents for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD. As a result, upadacitinib was approved for use in patients with moderate-to-severe AD by the European Medicines Agency (2021), Health Canada (2021) and the FDA (2022) in the last year. It is important for dermatologists to be aware of the clinical evidence to continue incorporating the use of upadacitinib into the treatment algorithm for AD, which will ultimately lead to improved patient outcomes. Therefore, this review is an up-to-date summary of the clinical data available on the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib treatment for AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".