MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309014071 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noac209.469

EPCO-35. THE ZINC FINGER IN THE CEREBELLUM (ZIC1/4) LOCUS IS A CONTEXT DEPENDENT DRIVER GENE IN MEDULLOBLASTOMA

2022· article· en· W4309014071 on OpenAlexaff
Ran Tao, Zhen You, Frank T. Huang, Paul A. Northcott, Michael Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpigeneticsBiologyChromatinMedulloblastomaGeneticsCancer researchGenePhenotypeHigh-mobility groupContext (archaeology)Histone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Medulloblastoma (MB) is a malignant paediatric brain tumor comprised of 4 molecularly and clinically distinct subgroups: WNT, SHH, Group 3 and Group 4. Previous studies have reported recurrent, mutually exclusive epigenetic modifier mutations converging in these subgroups, as well as aberrant H3K27me3 depositions within these tumors. While these observations hint at aberrant epigenetic mechanisms driving MB pathobiology, detailed understanding of MB chromatin landscape remains elusive to date. As such, chromatin landscape of MB was defined by conducting H3K27Ac ChIP-Seq in 102 primary MB tumors and H3K27me3 ChIP-Seq in 63 overlapping tumors. Chromatin landscape of Medulloblastoma was subgroup specific and H3K27me3 modification recurrently repressed ZIC1 in Group 3 and 4 MB, a driver gene that is also recurrently mutated within Group 4 and SHH MB. Validation cohort comprised of 251 MB samples with matching RNA-Seq and WGS data demonstrated that the ZIC1 - ZIC4 locus (ZIC1/4) undergoes recurrent epigenetic repression of single alleles in 25% of Group 3, 50% of Group 4 but rarely in other subgroups. Strikingly, ZIC1 mutations in the Group 4 tumors always occurred in the context of repression of the wildtype allele, revealing a recurrent convergence of genetic and epigenetic mechanisms targeting both copies of ZIC1. Overexpression of ZIC1 and ZIC4 together, or ZIC1 alone to a lesser extent, lead to reduced proliferation of Group 3 MB cells in vitro and in vivo. Intriguingly, while Group 4 ZIC1 mutations exhibited loss of function phenotypes, SHH ZIC1 mutations exhibited gain of function phenotypes. Overexpression of ZIC1 in Granule Progenitor Cells (GPC), which give rise to SHH MB, resulted in increased proliferation of cells in contrast to Group 3 MB cells. Taken together, we demonstrate that multiple epigenetic and genetic mechanisms converge to govern context dependent driver roles for ZIC1 and ZIC4 underlying MB pathobiology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.835
Threshold uncertainty score0.698

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicHedgehog Signaling Pathway StudiesFrench-language works237,207