MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4309014408 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noac209.452

EPCO-17. UNMASKING CLONAL EVOLUTION OF DIFFUSE INTRINSIC GLIOMA USING MULTI-MODAL GENOMIC DATA

2022· article· en· W4309014408 on OpenAlexaff
Palak Patel, Scott Ryall, Andrei L. Turinsky, Robert Siddaway, Sanja Pajovic, Pawel Buczkowicz, Michael Brudno, Arun Ramani, Cynthia Hawkins

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyEpigeneticsSomatic evolution in cancerEpigenomeDNA methylationTranscriptomeGeneticsGliomaExome sequencingEpigenomicsExomeGenomePhenotypeComputational biologyGeneGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is an infiltrative incurable tumor affecting children. DIPG tumors often harbor a recurrent H3K27M mutation which leads to a global loss of H3K27me2/3 and overall DNA hypomethylation, suggesting an important role of the epigenome, and consequent transcriptome in DIPG pathogenesis. To thoroughly characterize the clonal evolution of DIPG, we collected 33 samples from 7 DIPG patients using a multi-region sampling strategy and generated whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing, and DNA methylation profiling data. Using our novel bioinformatics approach, 28 distinct tumor sub-clones were identified and characterized in our cohort of DIPG patients whilst simultaneously interrogating the tumor’s ability to migrate and disseminate. When present, initiating tumor clone (Clone 1) exclusively contained H3K27M with significant DNA methylation changes whereas the divergent clones that arise later in DIPG evolutionary trees were typically driven by the copy number aberrations. Further characterization of DIPG sub-clones identified unique gene expression profiles (i.e. cell migration and angiogenesis programs) that support and enable DIPG dissemination. In this study, we uncovered how DIPG evolves at the genetic, epigenetic, and transcriptional levels in parallel and in doing so, reveal novel evolutionary phenotypes at the sub-clonal level related to the tumor’s behavior. We are further validating these results in single-cell RNA sequencing experiments and gaining further insights into the underlying molecular mechanisms responsible for invasive and aggressive DIPG phenotypes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→