DDDR-36. VAL-083 IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA TREATED UNDER EXPANDED ACCESS PROGRAM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Current standard-of-care for glioblastoma (GBM) includes surgery followed by radiation with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. There are limited treatment options available upon progression or recurrence of disease. Options often involve participation in clinical trials with promising new therapies. However, patients may not meet the strictly defined entry criteria to participate in these clinical trials. Under an Expanded Access (EA) program, we have treated 14 recurrent GBM patients with VAL-083, they were not eligible to participate in other clinical trials. The median time from last progression to start of VAL-083 was 1.0 month (95%CI:0.09-2.67). All patients had received chemoradiation with temozolomide. Five (5/14;36%) patients had ≥ 2 recurrences, 8/14 (57%) had multifocal disease, and the median KPS was 80 (95%CI:70-90). All patients had unmethylated MGMT promoter, 13/14 (93%) were IDH-WT, 9/14 (64%) had a TERT promoter mutation, 6/14 (43%) had a PTEN mutation, and 4/14 (28%) had an EGFR mutation. All patients received treatment with VAL-083 at 30 mg/m2 x 3 days every 21 days. Five patients with cerebral edema refractory to steroids received bevacizumab (BEV;10 mg/kg) concurrently with VAL-083, and 8 patients received dexamethasone (Dex; >4 mg/day) with VAL-083. This is the first report of the use of VAL-083 in combination with BEV (VAL-03/BEV).The main adverse event was thrombocytopenia consistent with prior experience. Four (4/14; 28%) patients had a dose reduction, 3 of which were due to thrombocytopenia. No patients had a dose reduction while receiving VAL-083/BEV. Two patients who progressed on VAL-083, were later treated with CCNU, and myelosuppression was not observed.Median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) from last progression were 5.7 months (95%CI:1.3-7.9) and 8.3 months (95%CI:3.0-14.3), respectively. Additional treatment, safety and outcome data will be presented at the meeting.Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03138629. EA treatment plans were approved by MD Anderson Cancer Center IRB.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".