MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4309014881 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noac209.396

DDDR-31. THE THERAPEUTIC POTENTIAL OF THE LONG NON-CODING RNA LNC-HLX-2-7 IN GROUP 3 MEDULLOBLASTOMAS IN CHILDREN

2022· article· en· W4309014881 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Keisuke Katsushima, Menglang Yuan, Bongyong Lee, Stacie Stapleton, George I. Jallo, Sudipta Seal, Charles G. Eberhart, Ranjan J. Perera

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of California, San FranciscoAssociazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul CancroHospital for Sick ChildrenLazio Innova
KeywordsBiologyChromatin immunoprecipitationCancer researchMedulloblastomaRNAEnhancerLong non-coding RNAPromoterGeneGene expressionGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Medulloblastoma (MB) is an aggressive brain tumor that predominantly affects children. Recent high-throughput sequencing studies suggest that the non-coding RNA genome, in particular long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), contributes to MB formation and tumor progression. Here we report the identification of a novel lncRNA, lnc-HLX-2-7, as a potential therapeutic target in group 3 MBs. In this study, we report that lnc-HLX-2-7 RNA specifically accumulates in the HLX (host gene of lnc-HLX-2-7) promoter region and activates HLX expression by recruiting multiple factors including enhancer elements. RNA sequencing and chromatin immunoprecipitation revealed that HLX directly binds to the promoters of several tumor-promoting genes, including MYC, and activates their expression. Furthermore, intravenous treatment with antisense oligonucleotides targeting lnc-HLX-2-7 coated with cerium-oxide nanoparticle (CNP-lnc-HLX-2-7) reduced tumor growth (40-50%) in intracranial MB xenograft mouse model (n = 10, p < 0.01, t-test). We found that the combinatorial therapy of CNP-lnc-HLX-2-7 and cisplatin further inhibits tumor growth and significantly prolongs mouse survival compared to CNP-lnc-HLX-2-7 monotherapy (n = 10, p < 0.01, t-test) only. We report here the importance of the lnc-HLX-2-7-HLX-MYC axis in regulating group 3 MB progression and provide a strong rationale for using lnc-HLX-2-7 as a specific and potent therapeutic target for the group 3 MBs in children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research→French-language works237,207→