MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309017246 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noac209.958

RBIO-06. CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR PREDICTORS OF RADIATION RESPONSIVENESS IN MENINGIOMAS: A MULTICENTER RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

2022· article· en· W4309017246 on OpenAlexaff
Justin Z. Wang, Farshad Nassiri, Vikas Patil, Jeff Liu, Grace Lee, Lauren Rogers, Derek S. Tsang, Normand Laperrière, Gelareh Zadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMeningioma and schwannoma management
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeningiomaMedicineOncologyCohortDNA methylationInternal medicinePropensity score matchingMalignant meningiomaPathologyBiologyGene expressionGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND Aside from surgery, radiotherapy (RT) remains the only standard of care treatment for meningiomas. However, few studies have identified clinical/molecular biomarkers associated with responsiveness to RT and the optimal timing of RT after surgery remains controversial. We aimed to assess outcomes in a large multi-institutional cohort of RT-treated meningiomas to identify clinical factors and DNA methylation and RNA expression markers associated with progression-free survival (PFS) post-RT. METHODS Patients with intracranial meningiomas who underwent treatment with fractionated RT between 1997-2018 were included. DNA-methylation using the Illumina 850K EPICArray and RNA-sequencing were performed on tumours with sufficient tissue. Primary endpoints were radiographic recurrence of progression and time to progression from the time of RT completion. RESULTS 404 meningiomas were included for analysis. Of these, 167 (41.3%) recurred post-RT, usually within 5-years of RT. Previous RT to the meningioma, having a WHO grade 3 meningioma, and older age at diagnosis were independently associated with poorer PFS post-RT. Following propensity score matching, patients that received adjuvant RT had significantly better PFS post-RT compared to those that received salvage RT after recurrence (p=0.04). DNA methylation on 220 of these meningiomas segregated tumours into two distinct methylation groups (RT-resistant and RT-sensitive) based on unsupervised consensus clustering. DNA methylation were able to independently predict PFS post-RT better than all clinical factors. Differential RNA-expression analysis of these groups showed up-regulation of pathways involved in chromosome segregation and mitotic cell cycle and down-regulation of fatty acid metabolism pathways in RT-resistant meningiomas. CONCLUSION While there are a paucity of clinical factors that can reliably predict a meningioma’s response to RT, DNA methylation and RNA expression biomarkers may aid in differentiating RT-resistant meningiomas from RT-sensitive tumours. Patients that receive adjuvant RT may have prolonged PFS post-RT compared to those that receive salvage RT only after recurrence has already occurred.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicMeningioma and schwannoma managementFrench-language works237,207