“I'm positively positive”: Beyond individual responsibility for resilience amongst older adults living with HIV
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In British Columbia (BC), Canada, older adults living with HIV (OALHIV — i.e., age ≥50) now constitute over 50% of all people accessing HIV treatment. In addition to living with HIV, OALHIV face significant adversity from sociostructural factors. Popular notions of resilience view resilience as an individual attribute (Coutu, 2002), commonly placing the responsibility for overcoming adversity on the individual. This community-based research on the home and community care of OALHIV involved semi-structured interviews with 27 OALHIV in BC. Interviews were analyzed thematically. Resilience was a key theme across 23 of the 27 interviews with OALHIV. This research moves beyond an individualistic notion of resilience to discuss interpersonal, neighbourhood/community, and multi-levels of resilience, including the importance of public policy and epidemic levels of resilience led by government and healthcare organizations to support OALHIV and the general population to age with dignity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.036 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it