Conceptualizing access to community-based supports from the perspectives of people living with young onset dementia, family members and providers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
People living with young onset dementia and their families have significant support needs, but experience difficulties accessing services. This study explored the process of accessing community-based services drawing on semi-structured interviews with people living with dementia, family members and providers in Winnipeg, Canada. Data analysis involved a combination of inductive coding and theoretical analysis using the candidacy framework as a conceptual lens. Forced to navigate services that do not recognize people with young onset dementia as a user group, participants experienced ongoing barriers that generated continuous work and stress for families. Access was constrained by information resources geared towards older adults and restrictive eligibility criteria that constructed people with young onset dementia as "not impaired enough" or "too impaired". At the organizational level, fragmentation and underrepresentation of young onset dementia diminished access. Our findings underscore the need for continuous, coordinated supports alongside broader representation of young onset dementia within research, policy, and practice. We conclude with a discussion of how the candidacy theory could be extended to account for the social and political status of user groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".