Development of Podcast-Based Irrational Belief Disputing Media to Increase Confidence of Body Shaming Victims in High School Students
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: This research and development aims to produce a podcast-based disputing irrational belief media to increase the self-confidence for victims of body shaming in high school students. This podcast is named the #PULIH podcast which is an audio visual medium and can be listened to independently through the Youtube platform. The #PULIH podcast consists of five episodes with different topics. Each episode discusses the aspect that will be changed, namely the perception of the physical by using the technique of disputing irrational belief. This research and development adapts the five stages of the Borg and Gall development model, namely the information collecting stage, planning stage, prototype development stage, initial field trial, and product revision stage. The initial field trial has three stages, namely the material expert test, the media expert test and the prospective user (student) test. The purpose of the assessment of experts and prospective users to determine the acceptability of the media which includes aspects of accuracy, usability, convenience, and attractiveness. Data analysis using the inter-rater agreement. The results of the expert and prospective user tests overall show a very high validation index. It is concluded that the podcast-based disputing irrational belief media is very appropriate, useful, easy, and interesting to increase the self-confidence for victims of body shaming in high school students. Abstrak: Penelitian dan pengembangan ini bertujuan menghasilkan media disputing irrational belief berbasis podcast untuk meningkatkan kepercayaan diri korban body shaming pada siswa sekolah menengah atas. Podcast ini ini diberi nama podcast #PULIH yang merupakan media audio visual dan dapat didengarkan secara mandiri melalui platform Youtube. Podcast #PULIH terdiri dari lima episode dengan pembahasan yang berbeda-beda. Setiap episodenya membahas aspek persepsi tentang fisik dengan menggunakan teknik disputing irrational belief. Penelitian dan pengembangan ini mengadaptasi lima tahapan dari model pengembangan Borg dan Gall yaitu tahap pengumpulan informasi, tahap perencanaan, tahap pengembangan prototype, uji coba lapangan awal, dan tahap revisi produk. Uji coba lapangan awal terdapat tiga tahap yaitu uji ahli materi, uji ahli media dan uji calon pengguna (siswa). Analisis data menggunakan inter-rater agreement. Hasil penilaian uji ahli dan calon pengguna secara keseluruhan menunjukkan indeks validasi yang sangat tinggi. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa media disputing irrational belief berbasis podcast sangat tepat, berguna, mudah, dan menarik untuk meningkatkan kepercayaan diri korban body shaming pada siswa sekolah menengah atas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".