MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309146342 · doi:10.17977/um059v2i22022p69-77

Development of Podcast-Based Irrational Belief Disputing Media to Increase Confidence of Body Shaming Victims in High School Students

2022· article· en· W4309146342 on OpenAlexaff
Rintiarni Restu Wulandari, Adi Atmoko, Diniy Hidayatur Rahman, Chea Lim, Septinda Rima Dewanti

Bibliographic record

VenueBuletin Konseling Inovatif · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedia Influence and Health
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIrrational numberPsychologyMedia studiesSociologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: This research and development aims to produce a podcast-based disputing irrational belief media to increase the self-confidence for victims of body shaming in high school students. This podcast is named the #PULIH podcast which is an audio visual medium and can be listened to independently through the Youtube platform. The #PULIH podcast consists of five episodes with different topics. Each episode discusses the aspect that will be changed, namely the perception of the physical by using the technique of disputing irrational belief. This research and development adapts the five stages of the Borg and Gall development model, namely the information collecting stage, planning stage, prototype development stage, initial field trial, and product revision stage. The initial field trial has three stages, namely the material expert test, the media expert test and the prospective user (student) test. The purpose of the assessment of experts and prospective users to determine the acceptability of the media which includes aspects of accuracy, usability, convenience, and attractiveness. Data analysis using the inter-rater agreement. The results of the expert and prospective user tests overall show a very high validation index. It is concluded that the podcast-based disputing irrational belief media is very appropriate, useful, easy, and interesting to increase the self-confidence for victims of body shaming in high school students. Abstrak: Penelitian dan pengembangan ini bertujuan menghasilkan media disputing irrational belief berbasis podcast untuk meningkatkan kepercayaan diri korban body shaming pada siswa sekolah menengah atas. Podcast ini ini diberi nama podcast #PULIH yang merupakan media audio visual dan dapat didengarkan secara mandiri melalui platform Youtube. Podcast #PULIH terdiri dari lima episode dengan pembahasan yang berbeda-beda. Setiap episodenya membahas aspek persepsi tentang fisik dengan menggunakan teknik disputing irrational belief. Penelitian dan pengembangan ini mengadaptasi lima tahapan dari model pengembangan Borg dan Gall yaitu tahap pengumpulan informasi, tahap perencanaan, tahap pengembangan prototype, uji coba lapangan awal, dan tahap revisi produk. Uji coba lapangan awal terdapat tiga tahap yaitu uji ahli materi, uji ahli media dan uji calon pengguna (siswa). Analisis data menggunakan inter-rater agreement. Hasil penilaian uji ahli dan calon pengguna secara keseluruhan menunjukkan indeks validasi yang sangat tinggi. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa media disputing irrational belief berbasis podcast sangat tepat, berguna, mudah, dan menarik untuk meningkatkan kepercayaan diri korban body shaming pada siswa sekolah menengah atas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.354
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBuletin Konseling InovatifSame topicMedia Influence and HealthFrench-language works237,207