MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309152186 · doi:10.1061/9780784484449.064

Real-Life Investigations of Inverse Filtering for Frequency Identification of Bridges Using Smartphones in Passing Vehicles

2022· article· en· W4309152186 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLifelines 2022 · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)AccelerometerFilter (signal processing)Computer scienceAccelerationVibrationGlobal Positioning SystemIdentification (biology)Suspension (topology)Real-time computingAcousticsComputer visionTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper puts forward a real-life assessment of a novel inverse filtering methodology to extract bridge features from acceleration signals recorded on smartphones in the passing vehicles. The vibration of a moving vehicle is affected by various features, such as suspension and speed. This study focuses on filtering out these effects from the signals to extract bridge frequencies as the vehicle crosses the bridge. Hence, the spectrum of the vibration data recorded on the vehicle when moving off the bridge is employed to form an inverse filter which removes the vehicle-related frequency content. Since the speed of the vehicle is found to be one of the most effective factors in the filter design in our previous studies, a database of the off-bridge vibrations is built for different speeds. Later, when the same vehicle is moving on the bridge, the corresponding inverse filter is applied to the recorded on-bridge data to suppress the vehicle frequencies and amplify the bridge frequencies. All the required data are recorded using the built-in accelerometer and GPS sensor of the smartphone, eliminating the need for any extra instruments. In addition, this approach considers each data source separately and designs a unique filter for each data collection device within each vehicle, which makes it robust against device and vehicle features. As a result of the proposed methodology, it would be possible to monitor a large number of bridges using crowdsourced data collected from the smartphones in the vehicles. Such methodologies are expected to improve the sustainability and resiliency of our future infrastructure systems and future cities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.562
Threshold uncertainty score0.531

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it