An RFX transcription factor regulated ciliogenesis in the progenitors of choanoflagellates and animals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Little is known about the origins of the transcriptional modules that coordinate cell-type specific functions in animals. The controlled expression of one cellular feature – the cilium – was likely critical during early animal evolution. Two key transcription factors, RFX and FoxJ1, coordinate ciliogenesis in animals but are absent from the genomes of most other ciliated eukaryotes, raising the question of how the transcriptional regulation of ciliogenesis has evolved. To reconstruct the evolution of the RFX/FoxJ1 transcriptional module and its role in the regulation of ciliogenesis, we investigated RFX and FoxJ1 function in one of the closest living relatives of animals, the choanoflagellate Salpingoeca rosetta . Targeted disruption of the S. rosetta RFX homolog cRFXa resulted in delayed cell proliferation and aberrant ciliogenesis, marked by the collapse and resorption of nascent cilia. Ciliogenesis genes and foxJ1 were significantly down-regulated in cRFXa mutants, consistent with a pre-animal ancestry for this transcriptional module. We also found that cRFXa protein preferentially binds to a sequence motif that is enriched in the promoters of S. rosetta ciliary genes and matches the sequence motif bound by animal RFX proteins. These findings suggest that RFX coordinated ciliogenesis before the divergence of animals and choanoflagellates, and that the deployment of this module may have provided a mechanism to differentiate ciliated and non-ciliated cell types in early animal evolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".