MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309261923 · doi:10.1101/2022.11.14.22282329

Trends in HIV testing, the treatment cascade, and HIV incidence among men who have sex with men in Africa: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis

2022· review· en· W4309261923 on OpenAlexaffabout
James Stannah, Nirali Soni, Jin Keng Stephen Lam, Katia Giguère, Kate M. Mitchell, Nadine Kronfli, Joseph Larmarange, Raoul Moh, Marcelin N’zebo Nouaman, Gérard Menan Kouamé, Mathieu Maheu‐Giroux, Marie‐Claude Boily

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreInstitut National de Santé Publique du QuébecMcGill University
FundersMedical Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthForeign, Commonwealth and Development OfficeEuropean and Developing Countries Clinical Trials PartnershipEuropean Commission
KeywordsMen who have sex with menMedicineDemographyIncidence (geometry)Meta-analysisPsychological interventionGerontologyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)ImmunologyInternal medicineSyphilisPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) are disproportionately affected by HIV. In Africa, MSM face structural barriers to HIV prevention and treatment including socio-economic disadvantages, stigma, and criminalization that increase their vulnerability to HIV acquisition and transmission and undermine progress towards ending AIDS. This systematic review explores progress towards increases in HIV testing, improving engagement in the HIV treatment cascade, and HIV incidence reductions among MSM in Africa. Methods We searched Embase, Medline, Global Health, Scopus, and Web of Science from January 1980-March 2022 for cross-sectional and longitudinal studies reporting HIV testing, knowledge of status, care, antiretroviral therapy (ART) use, viral suppression, and/or HIV incidence among MSM in Africa. We pooled surveys using Bayesian generalized linear mixed-effects models, used meta-regression to assess time trends, and compared HIV incidence estimates among MSM with those of all men. Findings Of 8,992 articles identified, we included 148 unique studies published from 2005-2022. HIV testing increased over time in Central/Western and Eastern Africa and in 2020, we estimate that 88% (95% credible interval (CrI) 57-97%) of MSM had tested in the past 12 months, but 66% (19-94%) of MSM living with HIV knew their HIV status, although this is probably underestimated given non-disclosure. Current ART use increased over time in Central/Western (OR year =1.4, 95%CrI 1.1-2.0, N=8) and Eastern/Southern Africa (OR year =1.4, 1.0-1.8, N=17) and in 2020 we estimate that 75% (18-98%) of MSM living with HIV in Africa were currently on ART. Nevertheless, we did not find strong evidence viral suppression increased, and in 2020 we estimate that only 62% (12-95%) of MSM living with HIV were virally suppressed. HIV incidence among MSM did not decrease over time (IRR year =1.0, 0.7-1.3, N=38) and remained high in 2020 (5.4 per 100 person-years, 0.9-33.9) and substantially higher (27-150 times higher) than among all men. Interpretation No decreases in HIV incidence have been observed among MSM in Africa over time, despite some increases in HIV testing and ART use. Achieving the UNAIDS 95-95-95 targets for diagnosis, treatment, and viral suppression equitably for all requires renewed focus on this key population. Combination interventions for MSM are urgently required to reduce disparities in HIV incidence and tackle the social, structural, and behavioural factors that make MSM vulnerable to HIV acquisition. Funding US National Institutes of Health, UK Medical Research Council, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Fonds de Recherche du Québec – Santé.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.347
Threshold uncertainty score0.936

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsFrench-language works237,207