Recent progress in the development of smart supercapacitors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Recently, with the continuous development of human society and the continuous innovation of technologies, the intelligence era has arrived. Various intelligent electronic devices continue to be developed, in which flexible wearable electronic devices are highly favored by people. To meet the requirements of the normal operation of intelligent devices, the key point lies in the development of new smart energy storage devices. Accordingly, smart supercapacitors have been widely focused on and studied by researchers recently with the introduction of intelligent functions, such as electrochromism, self‐healing, and shape memory, into supercapacitors to broaden their application fields and promote their smart development. This can meet not only people's energy needs but also people's diverse personality needs and make our life more convenient, fast, and more intelligent than ever. Therefore, it is very important to summarize related work on smart supercapacitors. Although researchers have performed much research on smart supercapacitors, there is still little literature summary on the related work of different smart supercapacitors. Accordingly, this paper mainly introduces the research progress on electrochromic, self‐healing, shape memory, and self‐charging smart supercapacitors in recent years and discusses the development prospects and challenges of smart supercapacitors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it