Review of the Effects of Freezing/Thawing Cycles on the Engineering Properties of Soilcrete
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Soil mixing, which blends the natural soils with cementitious materials (or binders), has been used to enhance the soft ground and improve problematic soils for several decades. With developments in technique and machinery, the embedded depth of soil mixing has increased from the shallow ground to as deep as tens of meters, especially when deep soil mixing and grouting emerged in the 1970s. Extensive studies have been undertaken on the physical and mechanical properties of the mixing products (soilcrete) with regard to water content, soil type, binder type, binder content, curing age, and curing condition. However, most studies initially focused on soil mixing in temperate weather. In recent decades, soil mixing in cold regions has become common. Thus, plenty of research has been conducted on the engineering properties of soilcrete exposed to weathering conditions in cold regions, namely freezing/thawing (F/T) cycles. However, while summaries of studies on soilcrete used in temperate conditions have been undertaken by researchers, reviews of studies on soil mixing in cold regions are still rare. In order to link potential research on soil mixing with previous studies and point out the possible research directions, a review of works on soilcrete subjected to F/T cycles was composed. The present paper summarizes the testing methods adopted by various studies and the change in engineering properties of soilcrete caused by F/T cycles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it