MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309312247 · doi:10.33140/jgrm.06.04.01

Understanding Sexual and Reproductive Health Needs of Adolescents: Evidence from a Formative Study in Three Districts of Lake Regions in Tanzania

2022· article· en· W4309312247 on OpenAlexaff
Mwifadhi Mrisho, Michaela Mantel, Abdunoor M. Kabanywanyi, Bakar S. Fakih, Fatuma Manzi, Sally Mtenga, Edna Selestine, David Siso, Micheal Mugerwa, Sofia Jadavji, Marleen Temmerman, Hussein Kidanto

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Gynecology & Reproductive Medicine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Canadian institutionsAga Khan Foundation
FundersAga Khan Foundation
KeywordsTanzaniaReproductive healthFocus groupNonprobability samplingQualitative researchThematic analysisMedicineFormative assessmentPsychologyFamily medicinePopulationEnvironmental healthSocioeconomicsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Teenage marriage and adolescent pregnancy present a significant health challenge in Tanzania. About 36% of women aged 15-49 are married before the age of 18, and 32% of rural adolescents (10-19 years) gave birth, compared with 19% of urban. In Mwanza region, one-third of currently married adolescents and women aged 15-49 experienced an unmet need for family planning and had low use of modern contraceptives. Here we present a study that explored the gaps in accessing and utilization of quality adolescent sexual and reproductive health services (ASRH). Methods: This was a descriptive and exploratory cross-sectional formative study utilizing multiple qualitative research methods. Purposive sampling was used to select an urban district (Nyamagana), a rural district (Magu) and an island (Ukerewe). Fifty-six In-depth Interview (IDI) and 30 focus group discussions (FGDs) stratified by gender (12 out-of-school, 12 in-school), and (3 male, 3 female adults) were purposefully sampled. An experienced moderator, along with a note-taker, led the discussions while taking notes. The FGDs were recorded using an MP3 voice recorder. A thematic analysis approach was undertaken and data were analysed using NVivo 12, a qualitative software. Results: Adolescent girls needed specific services such as counselling on menstrual health, sexual consent, HIV/ AIDS, and prevention of pregnancies. Sanitary pads during the menstrual period were a very important pressing need of adolescent girls. Adolescents both girls and boys preferred to receive friendly health care services in a respectful manner. Girls mentioned that they would like to receive SRH support from nurses in health facilities, mothers, sisters, aunties and friends. With regards to the boys, they preferred to receive the SRH from health care providers followed by their peer’s friends. Several obstacles were reported to hinder access to SRHS predominantly among adolescent girls as compared to boys. Poor infrastructure tended to impair the privacy at the health facilities, and rarely there were specific buildings to provide friendly adolescent sexual and reproductive health services. Conclusions: The strategies to guide the delivery of ASRH should involve the inclusion of duty bearers, promotion of friendly health care services where health workers provide services in friendly-manner, and provision of ASRH education for awareness creation to adolescents and supportive parents/ caretakers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.248
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Gynecology & Reproductive MedicineSame topicAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthFrench-language works237,207