The Effect of Date Palm Genotypes on Rhizobacterial Community Structures under Saline Environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Some genotypes of date palms (Phoenix dactylifera L.) are salt-tolerant; however, salinity significantly affects others. This study aimed to determine the root epiphytic bacterial contributions to the salt tolerance mechanism in the date palm and to verify if the salt-tolerant “Umsila” and the salt-susceptible “Zabad” cultivars have different bacterial communities. Therefore, the epiphytic bacterial community structures were investigated in both cultivars when grown under control and salinity conditions. The proximal soils of the roots were collected, the DNA was extracted, and a culture-independent approach using Illumina® MiSeq™ sequence analysis was carried out to identify the changes in the bacterial community structures in the soil samples due to the changes in salinity and the genotypes of the plants based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing. While salt tolerance response differences were evident between the two cultivars, the 16S rRNA gene sequencing results revealed 771 operational taxonomic units (OTUs), including 62 that were differentially accumulated in response to salinity. The ordination analysis showed significant (p = 0.001) changes among the communities in response to salinity in both cultivars. However, the results showed that the two cultivars had distinct bacterial communities when grown under controlled conditions, whereas they had a more similar bacterial community structure when grown under salinity conditions. The plant genotype does not affect the epiphyte bacterial community structure under salinity, probably because salinity affects the plant-microbe interaction similarly in both cultivars. Also, the identified rhizospheric bacteria are not directly associated with the root’s physiological processes in response to salinity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".