MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309347897 · doi:10.1002/cpz1.594

Bacteriophage Isolation, Purification, and Characterization Techniques Against Ubiquitous Opportunistic Pathogens

2022· article· en· W4309347897 on OpenAlexaffabout
Danielle L. Peters, Greg Harris, C. Davis, Jonathan J. Dennis, Wangxue Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Protocols · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicBacteriophages and microbial interactions
Canadian institutionsBrock UniversityUniversity of AlbertaNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcinetobacter baumanniiBacteriophagePhage therapyEnterococcus faeciumBiologyMicrobiologyAntibiotic resistancePseudomonas aeruginosaVirologyBacteriaEscherichia coliAntibioticsGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Healthcare-associated infection with "ESKAPE" pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species) is a global health crisis due to their extensive intrinsic antibiotic resistance and the ability to quickly acquire resistance determinants. Alternative treatment options are required to combat this crisis, and one possibility is the use of bacteriophages, or viruses that strictly infect the pathogenic bacteria. Currently, there is a renaissance in research and development into the use of phages to target multi-, extensively, and pan-resistant bacterial infections in humans, known as phage therapy. Using A. baumannii as an example, this article describes the isolation and purification of bacteriophages from sewage and soil samples, as well as general methods used in phage research such as precipitation of phages using polyethylene glycol, host range analysis, single-cell burst size determination, DNA extraction, and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. © 2022 National Research Council Canada. Current Protocols © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Reproduced with the permission of the Minister of Innovation, Science, and Industry. Basic Protocol 1: Isolation of bacteriophages against A. baumannii from sewage samples Alternate Protocol 1: Isolation of bacteriophages against A. baumannii from soil samples Support Protocol 1: Titering a bacteriophage stock Basic Protocol 2: Purification of phage to an axenic working stock Support Protocol 2: Liquid propagation of bacteriophage Basic Protocol 3: Host range analysis using the spot plate method Basic Protocol 4: Single burst size analysis Alternate Protocol 2: One-step growth curve Basic Protocol 5: Precipitation of bacteriophage using PEG 6000 Basic Protocol 6: DNA extraction from dsDNA bacteriophages Basic Protocol 7: Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of novel phage genomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent ProtocolsSame topicBacteriophages and microbial interactionsFrench-language works237,207