The effect of the Baduanjin for the elderly based on the meridian theory combined with the Intelligent Elderly Comprehensive Assessment on the cognitive function of patients with early-stage Alzheimer's disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To observe the effect of the Baduaniin for the elderly based on the meridian theory combined with the Intelligent Elderly Comprehensive Assessment on the cognitive function of patients with early-stage Alzheimer's disease. Methods Using the Intelligent Elderly Comprehensive Assessment system, 40 patients with early early-stage Alzheimer's disease were assessed. All patients received comprehensive treatment and nursing management, and modified Baduanjin exercise for 6 months was carried out. Before and after the intervention, the patients were assessed by the "Intelligent Elderly Comprehensive Assessment" system, and take a blood sample to detect blood lipids, serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), acetylcholine (Ach) and malondialdehyde (MDA). Results Six months later, the total score of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and factor scores of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) were higher than those before intervention, with significant differences(P<0. 05). The serum total cholesterol, IL-6 and MDA levels were decreased after intervention (P<0. 05), and the level of HDL was increased after intervention (P<0. 01). Conclusion Based on the theory of meridian, the Baduanjin exercise combined with the Intelligent Elderly Comprehensive Assessment can improve the cognitive function of the patients with early-stage Alzheimer's disease, and has the effects of lowering blood lipids, anti-oxidation and anti-inflammatory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".