MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309432024 · doi:10.29169/1927-5129.2022.18.09

Formulation and Characterization of Poly (Acrylic Acid)- Co-Chitosan Nanoparticles as pH-Thermo-Responsive System to Control Delivery

2022· article· en· W4309432024 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abir Derbali, Djallel Bouzid, Olivier Boyron

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Basic & Applied Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDirection Générale de la Recherche Scientifique et du Développement Technologique
KeywordsChitosanAcrylic acidZeta potentialNanocarriersNanoparticleDrug deliveryPolymerChemistryParticle sizeChemical engineeringControlled releasePolymerizationNuclear chemistryMaterials scienceChromatographyNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryCopolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study aims to develop a pH thermosensitive nanocarriers as a drug delivery system to better controll drug release. Nanoparticles was developed by the combination of smart polymers, chitosan and poly(acrylic acid) were chosen as biodegradable vectors to encapsulate and transport the drug. The used method was based on the polymerization of acrylic acid using reticulated chitosan as a template. Analysis of particle size, Zeta potential, and size distribution revealed that most of the resulting nanoparticles had an average diameter less than 100nm, with a high Zeta potentiel about -29.7 mV and a narrow size distribution. In addition, the developed system showed an encapsulation efficiency around 97%. In vitro release test was achieved using different buffer solutions with pH equal to 1.2, 3.6, 4.2, 4.8, 6.8 and 7.4. The release profiles showed that nanoparticles provide drug protection at different pH values. They responded at pH = 3.6 and provided sustained controlled release of up to 62.62% over 8 hours. The results reveal that the prepared nanoparticles can be used as drug delivery carriers. They can improve therapeutic efficiency of the drugs used in the treatment of inflamed tissues where the pH is around 3.6 as in the Crohn disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Basic & Applied SciencesSame topicNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryFrench-language works237,207