MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309534619 · doi:10.1152/ajplung.00430.2021

Magnetic resonance imaging-based scoring of the diseased lung in the preterm infant with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: UNiforme Scoring of the disEAsed Lung in BPD (UNSEAL BPD)

2022· article· en· W4309534619 on OpenAlexaff
Kai Förster, Hannah Marchi, Sophia Stöcklein, Olaf Dietrich, Harald Ehrhardt, Mark O. Wielpütz, Andreas W. Flemmer, Benjamin Schubert, Marcus Mall, Birgit Ertl‐Wagner, Anne Hilgendorff

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersDeutsches Zentrum für LungenforschungHelmholtz AssociationEinstein Stiftung Berlin
KeywordsBronchopulmonary dysplasiaMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingLungGestational ageLogistic regressionRadiologyInternal medicinePregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neonatal chronic lung disease lacks standardized assessment of lung structural changes. We addressed this clinical need by the development of a novel scoring system [UNSEAL BPD (UNiforme Scoring of the disEAsed Lung in BPD)] using T2-weighted single-shot fast-spin-echo sequences from 3 T MRI in very premature infants with and without bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Quantification of interstitial and airway remodeling, emphysematous changes, and ventilation inhomogeneity was achieved by consensus scoring on a five-point Likert scale. We successfully identified moderate and severe disease by logistic regression [area under the curve (AUC), 0.89] complemented by classification tree analysis revealing gestational age-specific structural changes. We demonstrated substantial interreader reproducibility (weighted Cohen's κ 0.69) and disease specificity (AUC = 0.91). Our novel MRI score enables the standardized assessment of disease-characteristic structural changes in the preterm lung exhibiting significant potential as a quantifiable endpoint in early intervention clinical trials and long-term disease monitoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular PhysiologySame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207