MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309548164 · doi:10.3390/medicina58111692

Adipose Autologous Micrograft and Its Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Bio Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Scaffold for Correction Deep Wrinkles, Facial Depressions, Scars, Face Dermis and Its Regenerations: A Pilot Study and Cases Report

2022· article· en· W4309548164 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lorenzo Svolacchia, Claudia Prisco, Federica Giuzio, Fabiano Svolacchia

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicina · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatologic Treatments and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyaluronic acidDermisExtracellular matrixMesenchymal stem cellWrinkleAdipose tissueBiomedical engineeringScarsStem cellMedicineAnatomyMaterials scienceSurgeryPathologyChemistryCell biologyBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this clinical study was to demonstrate that through a micrograft of viable adipose tissue cells microfiltered at 50 microns to exclude fibrous shoots and cell debris in a suspension of cross-linked hyaluronic acid, we were able to improve visible imperfections of the dermis and to improve clinically observable wrinkles, with a beneficial effect also in the extracellular matrix (ECM). Background and Objectives: With the passage of time, the aging process begins, resulting in a progressive impairment of tissue homeostasis. The main reason for the formation of wrinkles is the involution of the papillary dermis, as well as the loss of stem cell niches with compromise of the extra-cytoplasmic matrix (ECM), and the loss of hyaluronic acid, which helps to maintain the shape and resistance and that is contained in the connective tissue. Materials and Methods: This study involved 14 female patients who underwent dermal wrinkle correction and bio-regeneration over the entire facial area through a suspension containing 1.0 mL of viable micrografts from adipose tissue in a 1.0 mL cross-linked hyaluronic acid. To verify the improvement of the anatomical area concerned over time, the various degrees of correction obtained for wrinkles, and in general for texture, were objectively evaluated by using a Numeric Rating scale (NRS) 10–0, a modified Vancouver scale and a Berardesca scale. Results: The Berardesca, NRS and Modified Vancouver scales showed that with this technique it was possible to obtain excellent results both when the suspension was injected into wrinkles with the linear retrograde technique, and when it was injected with the micropomphs technique to correct furrows, with the intent to revitalize the tissue through progenitors with adult stemness markers. Conclusions: The combination of microfragmented and microfiltered adipose tissue and cross-linked hyaluronic acid at 50 microns is safe new method to treat soft tissue defects such as deep wrinkles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.840

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicinaSame topicDermatologic Treatments and ResearchFrench-language works237,207