Basin circulation affecting sediment partitioning in a fine-grained carbonate–siliciclastic, subaqueous clinoform: the Upper Jurassic–Lower Cretaceous Vaca Muerta Formation, Neuquén Basin, Argentina
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fine-grained sediments deposited under oxygen-deficient conditions are enriched in organic matter and hold considerable economic interest as unconventional reservoirs. The present analysis integrates sedimentological, ichnological and geochemical datasets to understand depositional processes in the Upper Jurassic–Lower Cretaceous Vaca Muerta Formation (Argentina), the most important economic unconventional play outside North America. For this purpose, cores from eight wells and one outcrop were examined. The succession comprises 13 facies associations corresponding to marginal-marine, basin, drift and slope environments, deposited in a mixed carbonate–siliciclastic, shelf-margin, subaqueous clinoform system. Estuarine circulation during warm and humid climates produced a stable stratification. Sediment delivery was dominated by pelagic processes in the bottomset, and hemipelagic processes and fluid mud flows in the foreset. However, the typical estuarine circulation changed to weakened estuarine or anti-estuarine during cool and arid climates, triggering wind- and thermohaline-driven contour (bottom) currents that reworked and oxygenated the complete clinoform system. The analysis suggests that distal–proximal trends are of lesser importance for the delineation of sedimentary environments in settings with contrasting basin circulation regimes and provides several insights to understand sediment partitioning in fine-grained clinoform systems. Supplementary material : The stratigraphic context of the Vaca Muerta Formation, an example of facies distribution in a well, trace-fossil descriptions, and X-ray diffraction and total organic carbon geochemical data are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6294914
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".