Corrosion-resistant polyurethane coatings from structure-homogenized biorefinery lignin through fractionation and oxypropylation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using lignin for polyurethane (PU) synthesis is challenging because of its heterogeneous structure, i.e., broad molecule weight (MW) distribution and diverse hydroxyl (OH) functionality. This complexity influences the crosslinking reaction between lignin and isocyanate and affects the quality of PU products. Here, we propose a two-step strategy for lignin structure homogenization by lowering its MW and uniforming OH functionality (step 2). Step 1 involves a bioethanol fractionation process, yielding fractionated lignin with one order lower MW than the raw lignin while exhibiting better processability for the subsequent process. Step 2 is performed by an oxyalkylation process using fractionated lignin that converts phenolic and carboxylic OHs to aliphatic OHs. As a result, we obtained structure-homogenized lignin with good compatibility and crosslinking with hexamethylene diisocyanate for PU coating synthesis. Moreover, PU coatings prepared from structure-homogenized lignin display a defect-free microscopic structure and show better corrosion resistance than coatings fabricated from its raw lignin alternative. Overall, the structure homogenization process is a beneficial way of using lignin as biopolyol in PU synthesis toward the application-oriented design of corrosion-resistant lignin-based PU coatings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".