Efficacy of Mexidol in patients with chronic brain ischemia and cognitive impairment of different age groups (results of sub-analysis of the international multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of sequential therapy in patients with chronic brain ischemia MEMO)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of sequential therapy with Mexidol and Mexidol FORTE 250 in comparison with placebo in patients of different age groups with chronic brain ischemia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: =13). The primary efficacy endpoint was the dynamic of increase of total score by MoCA scale, i.e. the absolute value of difference by MoCA scale at the point of day 75 comparing to values before treatment. As secondary efficacy endpoints results of dynamic by following questionnaires and scales were used: digit symbol substitution test, the Health Survey SF-36, asthenia subjective assessment scale (MFI-20), Vane questionnaire, Beck anxiety scale, Tinetti scale. RESULTS: After 75 days of treatment positive dynamic was revealed in cognitive, emotional and motor impairment in patients of 40-60 and 61-75 age subgroups both in groups of Mexidol and placebo, but in group of Mexidol the changes were more prominent which is proved by significantly higher values of median of absolute difference of total score of studied parameters. CONCLUSION: The results of trial showed that in patients of different age-subgroups with chronic brain ischemia the improvement in cognitive, motor impairment and quality of life, as well as decrease in vegetative impairment, asthenia and anxiety are observed after 75 days of treatment both in Mexidol and placebo group, but in Mexidol group these changes are more prominent. The data obtained confirm the expediency of the use of sequential therapy with Mexidol and Mexidol FORTE 250 in patients of different age subgroups with chronic brain ischemia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".