Accurate Crystal Structures of C<sub>12</sub>H<sub>9</sub>CN, C<sub>12</sub>H<sub>8</sub>(CN)<sub>2</sub>, and C<sub>16</sub>H<sub>11</sub>CN Valence Isomers Using Nonspherical Atomic Scattering Factors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fourteen crystal structures, mostly from good-quality datasets but including some marginal and twinned exemplars, from a series of novel polycyclic benzo- and naphtho-fused organic nitriles are presented and accurately described, including some related structures of a bromo-substituted and partially hydrogenated analogues. These structures represent a considerable increase in the number of published structures within their archetypes. This work highlights the significant advancement in structural refinement software proffered by NoSpherA2, which enables Hirshfeld Atom Refinement (HAR) of the structures within Olex2 v1.5. This results in the determination of C–H bond lengths with near to neutron diffraction accuracies at far lower experimental cost, and with an average improvement in C–C bond precision of 42% compared to Independent Atom Model refinements. H-atoms (apart from disordered components) refined well with anisotropic displacement parameters. Nonclassical H-bonding (C–H···N≡C) in this series is analyzed, and dipolar nitrile–nitrile interactions (C≡N···C≡N) in three major motifs described by (Wood, P. A. Acta Cryst. B, 2008, 64, 393−396) are found in 9 out of 13 nitrile-containing compounds of this series, a much higher proportion than the global average of 21% of nitrile-containing compounds. The HAR/NoSpherA2 approach shows increasing benefits with better data quality without apparent discontinuities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".