MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Harmonics Prediction and Mitigation using Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System Model based on Hybrid of Wind Solar Driven by DFIG

2022· article· en· W4309684540 on OpenAlexaff
Fawaz Al Hadi, Hamed H. Aly, Timothy Little

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmonicsAdaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemPhotovoltaic systemControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceWind powerHybrid systemRenewable energyWind speedFilter (signal processing)Artificial neural networkFuzzy logicFuzzy control systemEngineeringArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMeteorologyElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper a filter design methodology is proposed based on renewable energy hybrid model. The main function of the designed filter is to reduce the harmonics in distributed power systems consisting of hybrid renewable resources, wind and solar, leading to an increase in efficiency of such systems. The existence of harmonics in these systems is a direct result of the energy fluctuations and intermittency of the renewable resources. This necessitates the use of filtering system to mitigate the effect of these harmonics. The proposed model consists of wind turbine driven by Doubly Fed Induction Generator (DFIG) and a solar photovoltaic (PV). It is shown through the hybrid model that the generated power is not stable due to the wind speed and solar irradiation fluctuation. The forecasting phase of this work comes after establishing the hybrid model and generating the electrical power output. In this phase a model is developed using the simulated data and other relevant parameters as input for training to predict an hour and a day ahead. This work uses the Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) for forecasting purposes. Finally, the data obtained from the hybrid model simulations are analyzed in order to build an understand of the behavior. The inputs from study and forecast serve as inputs to select from a combination of filters to effectively mitigate harmonics for the proposed system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.458

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207