Half-open time-dependent multi-depot electric vehicle routing problem considering battery recharging and swapping
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to promote green and sustainable development of the transportation industry, an increasing number of logistics companies have begun to deploy electric vehicles (EVs) to provide urban distribution services. This paper studies a Half-Open Time-Dependent Multi-Depot Electric Vehicle Routing Problem Considering Battery Recharging and Swapping (HOTDMDEVRPBRS) in last-mile delivery. Based on the calculation functions of EV energy consumption, travel time, and carbon emissions under the time-dependent road network, a mixed integer programming model is formulated. The goal of the model is to minimize the economic cost and environmental cost of logistics companies. Given the complexity of the problem, this paper designs a multi-objective simulated annealing algorithm (SAA). Finally, this paper carries out comprehensive computational experiments to verify and evaluate the performance of the proposed model and method and examines the economic and environmental benefits brought by the Half-Open Joint Distribution Mode (HOJDM). According to the results, SAA shows good performance and provides a high-quality solution. Meanwhile, the HOJDM significantly reduces the total cost and carbon emissions of logistics enterprises and provides valuable suggestions for enterprise managers and government decision-makers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".