MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309811569 · doi:10.1149/ma2022-0212760mtgabs

A High Throughput Experimentation & Material Informatics Platform for the Discovery of Molten Salt Reactor Candidate Structural Materials

2022· article· en· W4309811569 on OpenAlexaff
Bonita Goh, Yafei Wang, Phalgun Nelaturu, Michael Moorehead, Dimitris Papailiopoulous, Dan J. Thoma, Santanu Chaudhuri, Jason Hattrick‐Simpers, Kumar Sridharan, Adrien Couet

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMachine Learning in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorrosionMolten saltMaterials scienceHalideMetallurgyAlloySalt (chemistry)Characterization (materials science)ChemistryInorganic chemistryNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ASME Sec(III) Div(5) code-certified structural alloys for Molten (halide) Salt Reactors (MSRs) such as 800H, SS316, and IN617 have significant Cr content. This makes them readily-degradable in molten halide salts due to the thermodynamic favorability of soluble chromium halide formation. It is therefore imperative to discover alloys with corrosion resistance that exceeds those of currently-certified alloys, which also possess the necessary high hardness and irradiation-resistance at reactor operating temperatures as a prerequisite for the licensing and deployment of MSRs. The largely-unexplored quasi-infinite quarternary FeCrMnNi High Entropy Alloy space shows promise to yield desired alloys. We present a high-throughput (HTP) process demonstrating a turnaround time from fabrication to corrosion-testing and analysis of 1 week for 25 samples. 70 alloy samples of 1cm 2 were each corrosion-tested on 0.3g salt droplets in isolated corrosion environments. The HTP platform includes the development of an in-situ high-temperature electrochemical sensor system capable of automating the analysis of dissolved corrosion product analytes in the salt. The results of the 70 corrosion tests were used to train a Machine Learning model to predict corrosion performance metrics (eg. Elemental corrosion concentration into salt) based on an input vector parametrizing the physical properties (“descriptors”) of the alloys in the sample set. The model was tested on 20 additional samples and demonstrated conservative predictive capability as well as facilitated the reduction of input feature space from 62 dimensions to 4 dimensions with negligible loss in predictive accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicMachine Learning in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207