MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309821626 · doi:10.1097/wno.0000000000001734

Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Men With Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Prospective Case–Control Study

2022· article· en· W4309821626 on OpenAlex
Anna Kabanovski, Aaron Chan, Colin M. Shapiro, Edward Margolin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuro-Ophthalmology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
Canadian institutionsSNC-Lavalin (Canada)Toronto East General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHypercapniaObstructive sleep apneaPolysomnographyBody mass indexCulpritAnesthesiaApneaProspective cohort studySleep apneaSleep studyInternal medicineCardiologyAcidosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is uncommon in men. Previous studies reported on high frequency of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in men with IIH, but the pathophysiology of this association remains unclear. One possible culprit for increased intracranial pressure in patients with OSA is hypercapnia. The purpose of this study was to compare the rate of hypercapnia during polysomnography (PSG) study in men with and without IIH and to report on the rate and severity of OSA in men with IIH compared with control subjects of similar age and body mass index (BMI). METHODS: Prospective case-control study of male patients diagnosed with IIH underwent PSG with continuous oxygen and carbon dioxide monitoring overnight. Healthy control subjects with similar age and BMI also underwent PSG. The incidence of OSA diagnosis, rate of hypercapnia and hypoxia, and apnea hypopnea index (AHI) were compared between 2 groups. RESULTS: Eleven subjects with IIH and 10 controls underwent PSG. Both groups were similar regarding age and BMI on the Mann-Whitney U test ( P = 0.072 for age, P = 0.251 for BMI). Subjects for whom carbon dioxide data were not available for more than 50% of total sleep time were excluded from hypercapnia analysis. The mean age was 41.9 years, and the mean BMI was 33.8 kg/m 2 in subjects and controls. OSA was diagnosed in 9 of 11 men with IIH and 4 of 10 controls. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of hypercapnia and hypoxia between 2 groups for whom the data were available. All patients with BMI over 30 kg/m 2 (7 of 7) and 50% (2 of 4) controls with BMI over 30 kg/m 2 were diagnosed with OSA compared with 50% (2 of 4) of cases and 33% (2 of 6) of controls with BMI less than 30 kg/m 2 . BMI was a significant predictor of total AHI ( P = 0.042) and OSA severity ( P = 0.023), but IIH diagnosis was not ( P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in hypercapnia rate between men with IIH and controls; thus, hypercapnia is an unlikely causative factor in pathophysiology of IIH. OSA on PSG was almost 2 times as prevalent in patients with IIH compared with controls; however, BMI was the strongest predictor of OSA diagnosis, and most patients (9 of 11) with BMI over 30 kg/m 2 had OSA on PSG. In men with BMI less than 30, the rate of OSA on PSG study was higher in men with IIH. Based on these data, we recommend that all men with the diagnosis of IIH should undergo PSG study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it