Design of Anti-Fouling Membrane Coatings for Desalination
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Desalination of brackish water and sea water has become increasingly implemented worldwide to combat drinking water shortages. This is especially true in remote regions where access to both fresh water and the nation’s electricity grid are missing. Renewable energy-powered reverse osmosis desalination plants seek to deliver potable water by utilizing standalone energy sources such as solar or wind, to power intermittently operated water filtration. The intermittent nature of operation, however, introduces enhanced fouling of the membrane surface due to a favorable environment for foulants to collect and grow. Thus, membrane coatings have been developed to reduce fouling occurrence. Described herein are the efforts to construct a reverse osmosis system to mimic remote plants, as well as the investigation of anti-fouling membranes under intermittent operations. A lab-scale reverse osmosis (RO) system is developed to allow testing and monitoring of water treatment processes. Multiple sensors used to measure water quality and permeate flow were incorporated inline to gather data in real time. Cross-flow RO cells utilizing flat sheet membranes enable simple sample preparation and analysis. Membrane coating technology used to improve treatment performance through enhanced antifouling properties was studied. Several coating possibilities were considered for criteria such as: cost, antifouling & anti-scaling properties, and water output quality. Polydopamine is a previously studied membrane coating, although thus far research has only extended to salt rejection of NaCl. There is a lack of research surrounding various membrane coatings when subject to real water sources, which contain a variety of salts and organic material. Additionally, intermittent operation has not been investigated. In this research, the coatings are tested under these conditions to determine their efficacy in reducing and delaying onset of membrane fouling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".