The endocytic recycling pathway is controlled by the ADP-ribosylated GTPase Rab14
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The GTPase Rab14 is localized at the trans-Golgi network and at the intermediate compartment associated to sorting/recycling endosomes-like structures of the transferrin-recycling pathway: as other Rab family members, it is involved in the regulation of intracellular vesicle trafficking, though its role and functional relationship with effector/endosomal proteins is still incomplete. We have analysed whether post-translational modifications could affect Rab14 activity: the results obtained define mono-ADP-ribosylation (MARylation) as the yet-unknown Rab14 modification, catalysed by the ADP-ribosyltransferase PARP12, which specifically modifies glutamic acid residues in position 159/162. This modification is essential for the Rab14-dependent endosome progression. Accordingly, recycling of the transferrin receptor is inhibited when MARylation of Rab14 is prevented by PARP12 knocking-down or inhibition, or by overexpression of Rab14 ADP-ribosylation-defective mutant. Under these conditions, Rab14 and transferrin receptors are withheld at the cell periphery at the level of the Rab4-RUFY1-positive sorting endosomes, indicating that the interaction of Rab14 with the dual effectors RUFY and then FIP1c (which specifically binds both Rab11 and Rab14) determines the progression between the Rab4-RUFY- and Rab11-FIP1c-specific vesicles. Therefore Rab14-MARylation determines the sequential binding of this GTPase to RUFY and FIP1c, thus controlling endosome progression ( i . e ., transferrin receptors recycling) through the Rab4-, Rab14- and Rab11-specific vesicles. This identifies a Rab14-specific compartment of the recycling pathway and a crucial enzymatic reaction amenable to pharmacological control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".