Improved Provenance Constraints for Nanaimo Group Sediments, British Columbia, Canada, Through Zircon LA‐ICP‐MS Depth‐Profiling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Detrital zircon from Late Cretaceous rocks of the Insular Superterrane have become an important constraint on Cordilleran paleogeography. These interpretations are largely based on the occurrence of a unique detrital zircon facies characterized by a broad Paleoproterozoic (mode 1.70 Ga) and narrow Mesoproterozoic mode (1.38 Ga) in Cordilleran sedimentary rocks. However, uncertainty about the provenance of this facies and the broad geographic distribution of rocks in which it is found limits its usefulness in constraining paleogeography. Detrital rims found on Mesozoic, Proterozoic, and Archean‐aged zircon cores from the Late Cretaceous Nanaimo Group of Western British Columbia, Canada provide constraints into its provenance. Depth‐profiling of a large population of grains (N = 16; n = 3,000), combined with observations regarding zircon external morphology, internal growth textures, U/Th ratios, and U concentrations, indicate high‐grade metamorphism occurred in the sediment source area between 99 Ma and 72 Ma. Rapid cooling of the metamorphic source area at rates of 35 to over 100°C/m.y. between 84 and 63 Ma was required to supply these metamorphic zircon to the basin. The geological history of the sediment source region defined by the rim populations (age of metamorphism and exhumation rate) is inconsistent with previously proposed sediment source areas for the Nanaimo Group in southern (Mojave region) or northern Laurentia (Lehmi Subbasin). We hypothesize that the sediment source area was the adjacent Coast Mountains Batholith and a metasedimentary rock, similar to the Pelona‐Orocopia‐Rand‐type schists, that was exhumed during the Late Cretaceous.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".