MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4310089938 · doi:10.1182/blood-2022-165775

Phase I Study Evaluating Outcomes of Autologous HIV-Specific T Cells Targeting Non-Escaped Epitopes (HST-NEET) Therapy in HIV+ Individuals on ART (NCT03485963)

2022· article· en· W4310089938 on OpenAlexaff
Danielle Sohai, Michael D. Keller, Patrick J. Hanley, Anushree Datar, Emily Reynolds, Dennis C. Copertino, Chase D. McCann, Haili Lang, Cecilia Motta, Andrew W. Wilson, Rebecca M. Lynch, Winiffer Conce Alberto, Zabrina L. Brumme, Natalie N. Kinloch, Carolina Colli Cruz, Lynsay MacLaren Ehui, Sarah Henn, R. Brad Jones, Catherine M. Bollard

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsAIDS VancouverSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpitopeMedicineImmunologyAdverse effectVirologyAntibodyImmune systemViral loadCD8Internal medicineHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While allogeneic bone marrow transplant (alloBMT) can offer a curative approach for HIV, successes have been limited. HIV-specific CD8+ T cells may be harnessed to eliminate or control HIV, but these responses are limited by factors including viral immune escape mutations. In this study, we hypothesized that T cell therapies targeting conserved HIV epitopes would be safe and show in vivo antiviral activity. This phase I clinical trial (NCT03485963) evaluated the safety, immunologic and virologic responses of a novel HIV-1 multi-antigen specific T cell therapy (HST-NEET) targeting HIV Nef and conserved epitopes of Gag and Pol in people with HIV suppressed on antiretroviral therapy (ART). We investigated whether infused autologous HST-NEETs expand, persist, and elicit anti-viral responses in vivo. Six participants with HIV (ages 33-57 years, 3 males and 2 females identifying as African or African American, 1 male identifying as White) received two infusions (2x107 cells/m2 BSA/dose) of HST-NEETs without prescribed lymphodepletion. Treatment follow-up was conducted for 48 weeks post-infusions. RESIST001 and 005 received infusions 4 weeks apart. RESIST003 and 004 received infusions >4 weeks apart (58 weeks and 35 weeks, respectively) due to delays caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. RESIST006 and 007 received infusions 2 weeks apart. RESIST004 was hospitalized for COVID-19 between infusions, but no attributable severe adverse events were observed for any participant irrespective of the timing of their infusions. All participants remained on ART throughout the study period. To determine the epitope specificities and breadth of the T cell repertoire within the infusion products, IFNγ ELISPOT and intracellular cytokine flow cytometric assays were used to evaluate antigen-specific responses to HIV Gag, Pol, and Nef in the HST-NEET products. These studies also support tracking of the infused T cells in vivo. ELISPOT, flow cytometry and TCR sequencing were conducted to evaluate expansion and persistence of HIV-specific T cell clones in vivo. Pre- and post-infusion, the genetically intact HIV reservoir was quantified using the intact proviral DNA assay (IPDA), while HIV Envelope gp120 (Env)-specific antibody levels were assessed using ELISA. HST-NEET infusion products met clinical dose requirements, with predominantly CD3+CD8+ (med 70.7%, range 19% to 95.6%) populations expressing effector memory (CD45RO+CCR7-CD62L-) (86.8-98.4%) markers. HST-NEET products had specificity for 1-3 viral antigens with a dominance of Nef-specific responses (Table 1). Epitope mapping of the products identified 10 recognized epitopes, including repeated Nef epitopes associated with the HLA-B07 supertype. Post-infusion studies (including TCR sequencing) for RESIST001 revealed marked in vivo expansion and persistence of T cells recognizing the same Nef peptide in the HST-NEETs product. However, no changes in HIV gp120 antibody levels or viral load were observed. RESIST005 HST-NEETs recognized 3 Nef epitopes but again, no changes in viral load were observed. RESIST004 also received a predominantly Nef-specific HST-NEET product eliciting expansion of Nef-specific T cells in vivo post-infusion. In contrast to RESIST001 and 005, a decrease in HIV reservoir size was observed in RESIST004 post-infusion #1 from 32.1 (pre) to 0 (at 36 weeks) intact proviruses/million CD4+ T cells (INTACT/M), which remained low at 8.4 INTACT/M post-infusion #2. RESIST003 products were broadly specific, mapping to 4 HIV Pol and 2 Nef CD8-restricted epitopes and at 5 weeks post-infusion #1, HIV reservoir size markedly decreased from 24.4 to 0 INTACT/M. Further, post HST-NEET infusion #2, the levels remained low (mean 6.3 INTACT/M). The immune and anti-viral studies are ongoing for RESIST006 and 007. In summary, these data suggest that infusions of HST-NEETs are safe, can elicit expansion and persistence of HIV-specific T cell populations post-infusion even without prescribed lymphodepletion, and may be associated with durable decreases in the HIV reservoir, as measured by intact proviruses. Although these studies are ongoing, the infusion of HST-NEETs may be a viable therapeutic strategy in the lymphodepleted setting post autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplant as is also being evaluated in 2 ongoing clinical trials (NCT04975698 and NCT04248192, respectively). Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHIV Research and Treatment→French-language works237,207→