MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310090950 · doi:10.22584/nr53.2022.007

The Legend of Thanadelthur: Elders’ Oral History and Hudson’s Bay Company Journals

2022· article· en· W4310090950 on OpenAlex
Rosalie Tsannie-Burseth

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Northern Review · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)University of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegendIndigenousHistoryNegotiationBayOrder (exchange)Oral historyGenealogyEthnologyAnthropologySociologyPolitical scienceArt historyLawArchaeologyEcologyBusinessBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article introduces the legend of Thanadelthur, a Dene woman who had a profound impact on the Dene people in Northern Saskatchewan and Manitoba during the eighteenth century fur trade. Thanadelthur was instrumental in the negotiation of a peace treaty between the Dene and Cree, and in helping the Dene to build a trade relationship with the Hudson’s Bay Company. These actions helped to create new economic opportunities for Dene communities and a good life for Thanadelthur’s people. While Thanadelthur’s life is documented in scholarly works and Hudson’s Bay Company journals, those records do not tell the entire story. Thus, this article also recounts oral stories told by Elders and others in order to expand this legend to include the perspective of the Dene. In bringing together the reports from Dene oral historians, scholars, and other authors, this article outlines the remarkable events in Thanadelthur’s life in order to underscore her historical significance to our communities and Canada at large. This article is a chapter in the open textbook Indigenous Self-Determination through Mitho Pimachesowin (Ability to Make a Good Living), developed for the University of Saskatchewan course Indigenous Studies 410/810 and hosted by the Northern Review.Tthainaltth’er t’ą-u Cǫmpani Kǫę ha Dene chu, Ená chu ëƚëhela nį snį, t’a-u dahłëlghël nį-u; Ąƚnëdhi chu Cǫmpani Kǫę honį nįhenįla si diri bëghą honį sį. Dene ëƚëhela tl’ąghë tsádhedh k’ets’įdel nį. Tthainaltth’er Denesuline ha nįdhen-ú, la Dene ha horenįle hël, Dene doreƚti nįthen t’a Dene ts’įnį nį. Tthainaltth’ur bëghą honį ƚą, ëritƚ’is k’e tth’i hëla, ąƚnëdhi behonié tth’i ƚą sį. T’ą-u Tthainaltth’er huya, yanathë honį k’onį ha. Canada k’eyaghë náide si, Tthainaltth’er denegodhë helį kuli horįcha hołts’į nį; Dena ha.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it