MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4310092952 · doi:10.1182/blood-2022-157256

Analysis of Immune Pharmacodynamic and Baseline Biomarkers in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma Treated with Mosunetuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide

2022· article· en· W4310092952 on OpenAlexaff
Mark Bishton, Corinna Woestmann, Franck Morschhauser, Toby A. Eyre, Maria Shin, Aaron Schroeder, Anton Belousov, Haocheng Li, Andrea Knapp, Michael C. Wei, Enkhtsetseg Purev, Alessia Bottos

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsRoche (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLenalidomideFollicular lymphomaInternal medicineLymphomaGastroenterologyPharmacodynamicsCD20RituximabOncologyImmunologyPharmacokineticsMultiple myeloma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Mosunetuzumab (M) is a bispecific monoclonal antibody targeting CD20 and CD3 that redirects T cells to eliminate B cells and has shown efficacy in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL; Budde et al. Lancet Oncol 2022). Lenalidomide (Len) is clinically active in FL, and its immunomodulatory activity offers potential synergistic efficacy when combined with M. Here, we present preliminary data from a Phase Ib/II trial (NCT04246086), which aimed to characterize pharmacodynamic biomarkers and investigate baseline (BL) features of early progressive disease (PD), in pts with R/R FL treated with M+Len. Methods: Eligible pts had Grade 1-3a R/R FL and received ≥1 prior systemic anti-cancer therapy. Pts received ≤12 cycles of M+Len (Cycle [C] 1: 21 days; C2-12: 28 days). In C1, step-up doses of intravenous M were given on C1 Day (D) 1 (1mg) and C1D8 (2mg), with the target dose (30mg) given on C1D15 and then on D1 of C2‒12. Len (20mg) was administered orally on D2‒22 (n=10) and on D1-21 of C2-12 for the remaining 19 pts. Activation of immune cells during M+Len treatment was assessed in longitudinal collections of peripheral blood by flow cytometry, and plasma IL-6 levels were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. CD20 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in BL and PD biopsies. CD20 loss was defined as ≤5% CD20+PAX5+ cells. Mutation profiling was performed by next-generation sequencing (NGS). A modified version of the AVENIO circulating tumor (ct)DNA analysis workflow and pipeline (Roche; for research use only) was used for NGS, based on the previously described CAPP-Seq technology (Kurtz et al. J Clin Oncol 2018). Results: A transient reduction in circulating T-cell counts (likely due to margination) and increase in percentage (%) of T cells expressing the activation marker CD69 were observed after M monotherapy in C1, and these kinetics were maintained in subsequent cycles, particularly in the CD4 T-cell population. Maturation of T cells, measured as % of T cells expressing human leukocyte antigen DR, increased after C2, following the addition of Len, and was sustained throughout M+Len treatment. The % of circulating programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)+ CD4 T cells increased after the first cycle of M, implying a rapid activation of T cells by M, and progressively decreased after C2. A decrease in % of PD1+ CD4 T cells suggested that sustained PD-1 expression, often a sign of T cell exhaustion, does not occur during M+Len treatment. Natural killer (NK) cells showed transient activation following M infusion (assessed as margination and % of CD69+ NK cells), and a sustained increase in functional markers, like granzyme B, during treatment with M+Len. IL-6 secretion was often enhanced after the first M infusion in C1. However, increased IL-6 levels were not observed after M+Len co-administration in subsequent cycles. As of April 25, 2022, 29 pts had been enrolled and were evaluable for efficacy. Best objective response rate was 89.7%, with complete metabolic response (CMR) observed in 21 pts (72.4%). Five cases of early PD (≤6 cycles of treatment) were observed. BL CD20 expression was heterogeneous (n=25 BL biopsies), and one CD20-negative pt experienced early PD. Two pts with early PD showed CD20 loss at progression. ctDNA analysis was performed in a subgroup of 5 pts with PD vs 5 with CMR for signal seeking. A trend towards higher median ctDNA levels at BL, measured as mutant molecules per mL, was observed in pts with early PD (400.1) vs CMR (58.6). Moreover, a higher median number of somatic variants was found in plasma (145.0) vs tissue (120.0) at BL, with a lower median concordance of plasma variants in tissue in pts with early PD (n=4; 43.8%) compared with those achieving CMR (n=5; 94.1%), suggesting higher tumor heterogeneity in early PD. Conclusions: In pts with R/R FL, our preliminary data suggest that M+Len activates the immune system. Increased % of T and NK cells expressing maturation and functional markers were observed during M+Len treatment. In contrast, addition of Len to M did not enhance IL-6 secretion, a cytokine known to be related with cytokine release syndrome, which is consistent with the manageable safety profile previously reported for this combination. Future investigations with a larger sample size are needed to further assess the prognostic value of CD20 expression in response to the M+Len combination and the prognostic value of ctDNA measurement at BL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→