MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310112977 · doi:10.1021/acs.est.2c05808

Capture-SELEX of DNA Aptamers for Estradiol Specifically and Estrogenic Compounds Collectively

2022· article· en· W4310112977 on OpenAlexafffund
Chenqi Niu, Chong Zhang, Juewen Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsAptamerSystematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichmentIsothermal titration calorimetryDissociation constantChemistryEstroneDNABiosensorSELEX Aptamer TechniqueCombinatorial chemistryBiologyBiochemistryMolecular biologyRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Estrogenic compounds such as estrone (E1), 17β-estradiol (E2), and 17α-ethynylestradiol (EE2) are serious environmental contaminants due to their potent biological activities. At least six selections were previously reported to obtain DNA aptamers for E2, highlighting its environmental importance. A careful analysis revealed that the previous aptamers either are too long or do not bind optimally. Herein, a series of new aptamers were obtained from the capture-SELEX method with dissociation constants down to 30 nM as determined by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). Two aptamers were converted to structure-switching fluorescent biosensors, which achieved a limit of detection down to 3.3 and 9.1 nM E2, respectively. One aptamer showed similar binding affinities to all the three estrogens, while the other aptamer is more selective for E2. Both aptamers required Mg 2+ for binding. The proposed sensors were successfully applied in the determination of E2 in wastewater. Moreover, comparisons were made with previous aptamers based on primary sequence alignment and secondary structures. Among previously reported truncated aptamers, ITC showed binding only in one of them. The newly selected aptamers have the combined advantages of small size and high affinities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations69
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & TechnologySame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207